O futuro da interação aluno-interface, uma visão da tecnologia educacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n2.1910Palavras-chave:
Interação homem-computador, interação aluno-interface, Tecnologia educativa, inteligência artificial, agentes inteligentes, desenho tecnológico, Covid-19Resumo
A partir das três interações de Moore na educação a distância, Hillman, Willis e Gunawardena (1994) propuseram uma interação tecnológica no domínio instrucional: a interação aluno-interface. Vinte e seis anos após sua proposta, essa interação é mais atual do que nunca pelo alto grau de tecnologização da tecnologia educacional devido ao seu vínculo com a inteligência artificial. Neste artigo, abordamos o passado, o presente e o futuro desta quarta interação, e expomos as três áreas tecnológicas mais importantes em torno da educação para o desenvolvimento futuro da interação aluno-interface: avaliação das interações tecnológicas no domínio da aprendizagem (usabilidade e experiência do usuário), capacidades de agente inteligente educacional (inteligência artificial e processamento de linguagem natural) e escopo de algoritmos preditivos em educação (aprendizado profundo e big data), elementos fundamentais, embora não os únicos, para o design da próxima geração de 2 e 3D interfaces interativas multimídia inteligentes para fins educacionais. Propomos a necessidade de um modelo interacional unificado, baseado no modelo triangular de Anderson-Moore, e recorremos ao teorema da equivalência de Anderson para hipotetizar um possível cenário futuro no curto, médio e longo prazo da educação altamente tecnológica.
Referências
Akyol, Z. & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework.
Research and practice. Information sciences reference, IGI Global.
Alexandru, A.; Tîrziu, E.; Tudora, E. & Bica, O. (2015). Enhanced education by using intelligent agents in multi-agent adaptive e-learning systems. Studies in Informatics and Control, 24(1), 13-22. Recuperado de: http://doi.org/10.24846/v24i1y201502
Alsharif, N. Z. & Roche, V. F. (2010). Promoting key interactions in a distance medicinal chemistry course.
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 114-125. Recuperado de: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2010.01.003
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2).
Anderson, T. & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities,
en Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Madison, Wi.: Atwood.
Baykal, S. I.; Bulut, D. & Sahingoz, O. K. (2018, April). Comparing deep learning performance on BigData by using CPUs and GPUs, en 2018 Electric Electronics, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineerings’ Meeting (EBBT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Bray, E.; Aoki, K. & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3).
Bringula, R. P.; Álvarez, J. N.; Evangelista, M. A. & So, R. B. (2017). Learner-interface interactions with mobile-assisted learning in mathematics: Effects on and relationship with mathematics performance, en K-12 STEM Education: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 305-321). IGI Global.
Bringula, R. P.; Basa, R. S.; De la Cruz, C. & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2016). Effects of prior knowledge in mathematics on learner-interface interactions in a learning-by-teaching intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 462-482.
Chang, Y. (2009). An action research of integrating computer technology in academic writing for undergraduates. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 37, 981-984.
Cho, M. H. & Cho, Y. (2017). Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: A scale development. Distance Education, 38(1), 70-83.
Cho, T. (2011). The impact of types of interaction on student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 10(2), 109-125.
Chou, C.; Peng, H. & Chang, C. (2010). The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: Students’ perceptions, uses, and evaluations. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1004-1017. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.011
Clark, R. C. (2020). Evidence-based training methods: A guide for training professionals. American Society for Training and Development.
Cope, B.; Kalantzis, M. & Searsmith, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge
and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory. http://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
Danesh, A.; Bailey, A. & Whisenand, T. (2015). Technology and instructor-interface interaction in distance education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(2).
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Doleck, T.; Lemay, D. J.; Basnet, R. B. & Bazelais, P. (2019). Predictive analytics in education: A comparison
of deep learning frameworks. Education and Information Technologies, 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10068-4
Dwivedi, Y. K.; Hughes, L.; Ismagilova, E.; Aarts, G.; Coombs, C.; Crick, T. & Galanos, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management,101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Garg, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in medical education. American Journal of Medicine, 133(2), e68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.017
Gunawardena, C. (1999). The challenge of designing and evaluating ‘interaction’ in web-based distance education, en WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet (pp. 451-456). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Gunesekera, A. I.; Bao, Y. & Kibelloh, M. (2019). The role of usability on e-learning user interactions and satisfaction: A literature review. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(3), 368-394
Hillman, D. C.; Willis, D. J. & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance
education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
Hsiao, E. L. & Huang, X. (2014). Promoting interactivity in a distance course for nontraditional students. RealLife Distance Education: Case Studies in Practice, 235.
Jancheski, M. (2017). Interaction in distance education, en 11th International Conference on Technology, Education and Development (INTED). Location: Valencia, SPAIN: INTED2017: 11th international technology, education and development conference Book Series: INTED Proceedings.
Jia, J. (2020). Educational stages and interactive learning: From kindergarten to workplace training. Information sciences reference, 437. IGI Global.
Kennepohl, D. (2020). Editorial. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), i-iii. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4812
Koola, P. M.; Ramachandran, S. & Vadakkeveedu, K. (2016). How do we train a stone to think? A review of machine intelligence and its implications. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(2), 211-238.
Kumar, S. G. & Reddy, G. H. (2019). Prediction of education performance using deep learning. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(7),361-364
Lee, M. K. (2015). Effects of mobile phone-based app learning compared to computer-based web learning on nursing students: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Healthcare Informatics Research, 21(2), 125-133. http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.125
Longo, L. (2020). Empowering qualitative research methods in education with artificial intelligence. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_1
Luckin, R. & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838.
Luo, H. & Lei, J. (2012). Emerging technologies for interactive learning in the ICT age. Educational stages and interactive learning: From kindergarten to workplace training (pp. 73-91). http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0137-6.ch005
Martin, F.; Parker, M. A. & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 228-261.
Mayer, R. E. (ed.) (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mladenova, M. & Kirkova, D. (2014). Role of student interaction interface in web-based distance learning, en ACHI 2014-7th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (pp. 307-312).
Mohan, S.; Ramea, K.; Price, B.; Shreve, M.; Eldardiry, H. & Nelson, L. (2019). Building Jarvis-A learner-aware conversational trainer. IUI Workshops on User-Aware Conversational Agents in conjunction with ACM Intelligent User Interfaces 2019, Los Angeles, California.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2).
Morgan, H. (2020). Best practices for implementing remote learning during a pandemic. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(3), 135-141. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1751480
Nacu, D.; Martin, C. K. & Pinkard, N. (2018). Designing for 21st century learning online: A heuristic method to enable educator learning support roles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 1029-1049. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9603-0
Nahar, L.; Sulaiman, R. & Jaafar, A. (2020). An interactive math braille learning application to assist blind students in Bangladesh. Assistive Technology (en prensa). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1734112
Nappi, C. & Cuocolo, A. (2020). The machine learning approach: Artificial intelligence is coming to support critical clinical thinking. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 27(1), 156-158. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1344-2
Nathoo, A.; Bekaroo, G.; Gangabissoon, T. & Santokhee, A. (2020). Using tangible user interfaces for teaching concepts of internet of things. Interactive Technology and Smart Education (en prensa). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2019-0061
Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. Norton & Co Inc. Raees, M. & Ullah, S. (2020). THE-3DI: Tracing head and eyes for 3D interactions. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(1-2), 1311-1337.
Rampton, V.; Mittelman, M. & Goldhahn, J. (2020). Implications of artificial intelligence for medical education. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(3), e111-e112. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30023-6
Rautopuro, J.; Pöntinen, S. & Kukkonen, J. (2006). Towards the information society - the case of Finnish teacher education. Informatics in Education, 5(2), 285-300.
Ricco, J.; Guetarni, F. & Kolh, P. (2020). Learning from artificial intelligence and big data in health care. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.01.019
Schlegelmilch, J. & Douglas, C. (2020). Initial Covid-19 closure strategies adopted by a convenience sample of US school districts: Directions for future research. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 1-4. http://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.147
Scolari, C. A. (2018). Las leyes de la interfaz: diseño, ecología evolución, tecnología (vol. 136). Editorial: Gedisa.
Şimşek, Ö.; Atman, N.; Inceoğlu, M. M. & Arikan, Y. D. (2010). Diagnosis of learning styles based on active/reflective dimension of Felder and Silverman’s learning style model in a learning management system, en International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 544-555). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12165-4-43
Tidwell, J.; Brewer, C. & Valencia-Brooks, A. (2020). Designing interfaces: Patterns for effective interaction design. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
UNESCO. (2020). Covid-19 Impact on Education. Recuperado de: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
Villegas-Ch, W.; Arias-Navarrete, A. & Palacios-Pacheco, X. (2020). Proposal of architecture for the integration of a chatbot with artificial intelligence in a smart campus for the improvement of learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). http://doi.org/10.3390/su12041500
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and healthcare professional education: Superhuman resources for health? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 96(1133), 121-122. http://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137132
Wang, C. & Tsai, W. (2016). Elucidating how interface design and cognitive function affect learning performance in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) software system. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(1), 31-46. http://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140044
Wang, H.; Rush, B. R.; Wilkerson, M. & Van Der Merwe, D. (2014). Exploring the use of tablet pcs in veterinary medical education: Opportunity or obstacle? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 41(2), 122-131. http://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1013-145R1
WBIS (2018). Proceedings -2017 international workshop on big data and information security, en Proceedings – WBIS 2017: 2017 International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security.
Wong, G. K. W.; Ma, X.; Dillenbourg, P. & Huen, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: Where to start? ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20-29. http://doi.org/10.1145/3381884
Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 38(1), 123-135.
Yang, S. & Bai, H. (2020). The integration design of artificial intelligence and normal students’ education. the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1453(1). http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1453/1/012090
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os direitos autorais pertencem aos autores do texto. Caso o manuscrito seja aceito para publicação, o Sistema de Universidad Virtual da Universidad de Guadalajara (UDGVirtual) está autorizado a modificar o texto na correção de estilo, traduzir, corrigir, divulgar, reproduzir, publicar e comercializar com este. Da mesma forma, a Universidad de Guadalajara está autorizada a realizar o acima descrito em conjunto ou por meio de possíveis terceiros. (Veja a autorização detalhada na carta de direitos autorais.)
Os autores garantem à revista Apertura o direito de ser o primeiro meio de publicação da obra. É autorizada a reprodução dos textos publicados na revista Apertura, no todo ou em parte, desde que sem fins lucrativos, citada a fonte e não modificados o conteúdo ou design. Os autores podem distribuir exclusivamente a versão editorial final ou postprint em qualquer meio e a qualquer momento.
Apertura, seus editores e UDGVirtual se dissociam das informações prestadas por colaboradores ou anunciantes. Os artigos dos colaboradores não representam necessariamente o ponto de vista do editor ou da UDGVirtual e o conteúdo dos anúncios são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos contratantes.
Apertura está registrada no Instituto Nacional de Direitos Autorais com o número ISSN: 1665-6180 (versão impressa) e e-ISSN 2007-1094 (versão eletrônica), e com o Certificado de Reserva de Direitos de Uso Exclusivo do Título: 04 -2005-120212472000-102.
Também é certificado pela Comissão de Qualificação para Publicações Ilustradas e Revistas do Ministério do Interior com os Certificados Licenciados de número de título: 13449; e legalidade do conteúdo: 11022.
