Content validity by experts judgment: Proposal for a virtual tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v9n2.993Keywords:
Content validity, experts judgement, virtual tool, research methodologyAbstract
The study describes the advantages of using a virtual tool designed to validate the content of research instruments, through the technique of expert judgment. This study presents the results of a survey applied to experts who participated as judges in the content validation, exposing their opinion and experiences in the validation of instruments. The ethodological design included three phases: the first, related to the design of the virtual tool; subsequently, the application of this tool through a real exercise and with the purpose of validating a questionnaire; for the last phase the results of the seven judges participants were analyzed. The findings show that the use of the virtual tool facilitates the organization of the information in items by dimension, and the registration of the opinion of the judges by the categories of clarity, coherence, relevance and sufficiency.
References
Cabero Almenara, Julio y Llorente Cejudo, María del Carmen. (2013). La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información (TIC). Eduweb. Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, vol. 7, núm. 2, pp.11-22. Recuperado de http://servicio.bc.uc.edu.ve/educacion/eduweb/v7n2/art01.pdf
Escobar Pérez, Jazmine y Cuervo Martínez, Ángela. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, vol. 6, núm. 1, pp. 27-36. Recuperado de http://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/psicometria/files/7113/8574/5708/Articulo3_Juicio_de_expertos_27-36.pdf
Pedrosa, Ignacio; Suárez-Álvarez, Javier; García-Cueto, Eduardo. (2013). Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación. Acción Psicológica, vol. 10, núm. 2, pp. 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820
Robles Garrote, Pilar y Rojas, Manuela del Carmen. (2015). La validación por juicio de expertos: dos investigaciones cualitativas en lingüística aplicada. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada, núm. 18. Recuperado de https://www.nebrija.com/revista-linguistica/files/articulosPDF/articulo_55002aca89c37.pdf
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright belongs to the authors of the text. In case the manuscript is accepted for publication, the Sistema de Universidad Virtual of the Universidad de Guadalajara (UDGVirtual) is authorized to modify the text in the correction of style, translate, fix, disseminate, reproduce, publish and market with this. Likewise, the Universidad de Guadalajara is authorized to carry out the above described jointly or through possible third parties. (See the detailed authorization in the copyright letter.)
The authors guarantee to Apertura the right to be the first means of publication of the work. The reproduction of the texts published in the Apertura is authorized, in whole or in part, as long as it is non-profit, the source is cited and the content or design is not modified. Authors may exclusively distribute the final editorial or postprint version in any medium and at any time.
Apertura, its editors and UDGVirtual dissociate themselves from the information provided by collaborators or advertisers. The articles of the contributors do not necessarily represent the point of view of the publisher or UDGVirtual and the content of the advertisements are the sole responsibility of the contractors.
Apertura is registered in the National Institute of Copyright with the ISSN number: 1665-6180 (printed version) and e-ISSN 2007-1094 (electronic version), and with the Certificate of Reservation of Rights to the Exclusive Use of the Title: 04 -2005-120212472000-102.
It is also certified by the Qualifying Commission for Illustrated Publications and Journals of the Ministry of the Interior with the Licensed Certificates of Title number: 13449; and Content Legality: 11022.
