Effective Strategies for Finding Open Educational Resources in High School

Authors

  • Ruth García-Solano Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla image/svg+xml
  • Juan Manuel González Calleros Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla image/svg+xml
  • Iván Olmos-Pineda Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v15n2.2393

Keywords:

Open educational resources, teaching practice, key practices, upper secondary education

Abstract

In the current digital environment, a wide variety of resources have emerged to support the teaching and learning processes. This research focuses on Open Educational Resources (OER), a technological innovation that, for its effective implementation within educational institutions, requires the active participation of teachers. The main objective of this research was to identify and solve some of the challenges faced by high school mathematics and physics teachers when incorporating OER into their teaching practice. To achieve this, an Open Educational Resources Workshop was designed and implemented. It was a qualitative research study that employs a Participatory-Action-Research methodology in which it was possible to identify repositories and platforms used by participating teachers. This process led to a change in the perception of the factor “Time to find, review, and select OER”. The research involved the participation of 20 teachers with experience in teaching mathematics and physics at the high school level, in both urban and regional contexts, with at least one year of experience. This work contributes to the knowledge about the incorporation of OER into high school teaching practice in a Mexican context. In addition, it allows the identification of variations in the 5R model, which provides a framework for the implementation of OER in similar educational contexts

Author Biographies

  • Ruth García-Solano, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla

    Estudiante
    Doctorado en Sistemas y Ambientes Educativos
    Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
    DSAE-BUAP

    Línea de investigación: Multimedia y Desarrollo Educativo

  • Juan Manuel González Calleros, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla
    Juan Manuel Gonzalez Calleros is a professor of the University Autonomous of Puebla (BUAP). He is member of the Belgian Lab of Human Computer Interaction and of the UsiXML consortium. He received a master degree in Computer Sciences at National Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and Electronic (Mexico). Having received a scholarship award from the European Union (ALBAN ) co-financed by the Mexican Government (CONACYT), he received a DEA and PhD in computer science at Université catholique de Louvain, and his dissertation research focused on a Methodology for Developing 3D User Interfaces of Information Systems guided with a set of principles. He is currently working in the different projects related to the design and development of context-aware User Interfaces.

    Specialties: 3D web design, Model-Based User Interface Development, development process for interactive systems, organizational analysis, business process modeling, workflow information systems, user-centered design
  • Iván Olmos-Pineda, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla
    Soy profesor en el área de Ciencias de la Computación, con un doctorado en Ciencia de la Computación por parte
    del INAOE, con especialidad en las áreas de Reconocimiento de Patrones, Aprendizaje Automático.

References

Area Moreira, M. (2021). La enseñanza remota de emergencia durante la covid-19. Los desafíos postpandemia en la Educación Superior. Propuesta Educativa, 30(56), 57-70. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4030/403070017007/html/

Baas, M.; Admiraal, W. & Van den Berg, E. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of open educational resources in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.510

Baas, M.; Van der Rijst, R.; Huizinga, T.; Van denBerg, E. & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessments of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54(100857). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857

Bautista Cárdenas, N. P. (2011). Proceso de investigación cualitativa: Epistemología, metodología y aplicaciones. El Manual Moderno.

Bell, J. (2005). Cómo hacer tu primer trabajo de investigación. Gedisa.

Bernal Torres, C. A. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. Pearson Educación.

Beaven, T. (2018). Dark reuse: an empirical study of teachers’ OER engagement. Open Praxis, 10(4), 377-391. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.889

Belikov, O. M. & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308

Blaxter, L.; Hughes, C. y Tight, M. (2000). Cómo se hace una investigación.

Gedisa

Bozkurt, A. & Gil Jaurena, I. (2023). Shaping the Future by Looking at the Past of Openness in Education and Open Praxis: Rising on the Shoulders of Giants. Open Praxis, 15(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.558

Cabero Almenara, J. y Llorente Cejudo, M. (2013). La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información (TIC). Eduweb Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, 7(2), 11-22. https://revistaeduweb.org/index.php/eduweb/article/view/206

Contreras, R. (2002). La investigación-acción participativa, IAP: revisando sus metodologías y sus potencialidades, en R. Contreras (ed.), Experiencias y metodología de la investigación participativa (9-18). https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6024

Contreras M.; Fidel, E. & Gómez Zermeño, M. G. (2017). Technological appropiation for the effective incorporation of open educational resources. Apertura, 9(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v9n1.1028

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.

Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096

Drevensek, M. & Urbancic, T. (2022). The role of teamwork in the creation of open educational resources for closing SDG-related knowledge gaps. Open Praxis, 14(2), 148-161. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.266

Khalid, F.; Wu, M.; Ting, D.; Thoma, B.; Haas, M.; Brenner, M.; Kim, Y. M. & Chan, T. (2023). Guidelines: The Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.817

Kimmons, R. & Jensen, B. (2023). The Open Guidebook Approach: designs to support collaborative, close-to-practice teacher learning. Open Praxis, 15(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.521

Franco, D. C. & Bidarra, J. (2022). Instructional design of online courses in Mozambique: The use of ebooks as a strategy to improve learning. Open Praxis, 14(2), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.141

García Solano, R.; González Calleros, J. M. y Olmos Pineda, I. (2021). Factores que influyen en la adopción de repositorios de recursos educativos abiertos por parte de los docentes, en D. Mocencahua-Mora, J. Guerrero-García, J. M. González-Calleros, E. Vera-Cervantes y Y. Navarro-Rangel (ed.), Sistemas y ambientes educativos: experiencias educativas en la covidianidad (121-138). United Academic Journals. http://www.dgie.buap.mx/dsae/images/dsae/2021/2021JISAEFinal.pdf

Geser, G. (2007). Open educational practices and resources. OLCOS Roadmap, 2012. Olcos. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498433

Hernández Ávila, C. E. y Carpio Escobar, N. A. (2019). Introducción a los tipos de muestreo. Alerta, Revista Científica del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.5377/alerta.v2i1.7535

Jhangiani, R. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2017). Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc

Lo, L. S.; Jordan, J. y Surbaugh, H. (2023). El costo del éxito: explorando el impacto de los costos de los libros de texto en una institución R1 que atiende a hispanos. Open Praxis, 15(2), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.2.554

Mallmann, E. M. y Ferreira Nobre, A. M. (2017). Um canal aberto no ensino superior? MOOC e REA no mundo digital. Apertura, 9(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v9n2.1126

Marín, V. I.; Zawacki-Richter, O.; Cengiz, H. A.; Bond, M.; Bozkurt, A.; Conrad, D.; Jung, I.; Kondakci, Y.; Prinsloo, P.; Roberts, J.; Veletsianos, G.; Xiao, J. & Zhang, J. (2022). Faculty perceptions, awareness and use of open educational resources for teaching and learning in higher education: a cross-comparative analysis. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00185-z

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (Unesco). (2020). Anexo VI Recomendación sobre los Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA). Resoluciones e informes de la Conferencia General en su 40ª reunión. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372579_spa/PDF/372579spa.pdf.multi

Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and Diffusion of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Education: A Meta-Analysis of 25OER-Projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472

Recio Mayorga, J.; Gutiérrez Esteban, P. & Suárez Guerrero, C. (2021). Open Educational Resources in virtual teaching communities. Apertura, 13(1), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v13n1.1921

Redcay, A.; Pfannesntiel, A. N. & Albert, D. (2022). The Development and Validation of the Zero Cost Textbook Satisfaction Scale (ZSS). Open Praxis, 14(4), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.4.487

Schuser, R. & Baas, Y. (2023). Reuse of OER, a Process Model Approach, en D. Otto, G. Scharnberg, M. Kerres & O. Zawacki-Richter (eds.), Distributed Learning Ecosystem (117-137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38703-7_7

Stagg, A. & Partidge, H. (2019). Facilitating open access to information: a community approach to open education and open textbooks. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 477-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.76

Tillinghast, B. (2020). Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 159-174. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265738

Van Allen, J. & Katz, S. (2019). Developing Open Practices in Teacher Education: An Example of Integrating OER and Developing Renewable Assignments. Open Praxis, 11(3), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.972

Van Allen, J. & Katz, S. (2020). Teaching with OER during pandemics and beyond. Journal for Multicultural Education, 14(3), 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JME-04-2020-0027

Versantvoort, M. & Schuwer, R. (2023). Towards Sustainable OER Practices: The Case of Bachelor Nursing in the Netherlands. Open Praxis, 15(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.2.542

Wang, S. & Wang, H. (2017). Adoption of open educational resources (OER) textbook for an introductory information systems course. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(3), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1354762

Wiley, D. (2013, October 21). What is open pedagogy? Open Content. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975

Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The Access Compromise and the 5th R. Open Content. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221

Wiley, D. y Hilton J. (2019). Definiendo la pedagogía habilitada para REA. Revista Mexicana de Bachillerato a Distancia, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.22201/cuaed.20074751e.2019.21.68216

Published

2023-09-25