Validación de contenido de una escala sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en el aprendizaje universitario (EPIA-U)

Autores

Palavras-chave:

inteligencia artificial, educación superior, validez de contenido, validación de instrumento, aprendizaje universitario

Resumo


El propósito de este estudio fue determinar la validez de contenido de una escala diseñada para evaluar el uso de la inteligencia artificial en el aprendizaje universitario (EPIA-U). El instrumento está conformado por 28 ítems distribuidos en cuatro dimensiones: apoyo académico, personalización del estudio, satisfacción con el uso y dependencia percibida. Nueve jueces expertos en educación, tecnología e investigación evaluaron los ítems en función de los criterios de claridad, relevancia y congruencia, utilizando una escala tipo Likert de cuatro puntos. Los análisis se realizaron mediante el coeficiente V de Aiken y el Coeficiente de Validez de Contenido (CVC) de Hernández-Nieto. Los resultados evidenciaron valores superiores al umbral de aceptación (≥ 0.75) y un CVC global de 0.90, lo que indica un alto grado de acuerdo entre los jueces. En conclusión, la escala EPIA-U presenta una adecuada validez de contenido y constituye una herramienta sólida para futuras fases de validación empírica y factorial en el ámbito de la educación superior.

Biografia do Autor

  • José Luis Girarte Guillén, Universidad de Montemorelos, AC
    Licenciado en Administración de Sistemas Computacionales de la Universidad de Montemorelos, Maestría en Administración de empresas, Maestría en Educación, de la Universidad de Montemorelos y además tiene una Licenciatura en Bibliotecología de la Universidad de Guadalajara. Y tiene un Doctorado en Educación de la Universidad de Montemorelos. Es Profesor en el área de informática aplicada a la educación.

Referências

Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7

Abbasi, B. N., Wu, Y., & Luo, Z. (2025). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on curriculum development in global higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13113-z

Airaj, M. (2024). Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 17145–17167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12545-x

Al-Emran, M., Abu-Hijleh, B., & Alsewari, A. A. (2024). Examining the impact of Generative AI on social sustainability by integrating the information system success model and technology-environmental, economic, and social sustainability theory. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 9405–9426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13201-0

Al-Zahrani, A. M., y Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 912. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02814-2

Anani, G. E., Nyamekye, E., & Bafour-Koduah, D. (2025). Using artificial intelligence for academic writing in higher education: The perspectives of university students in Ghana. Discover Education, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00434-5

Anani, S., Azzahra, R., y Darmawan, T. (2025). Using artificial intelligence for academic writing: Students’ experiences, challenges, and ethical reflections in higher education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100245

Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning. Discover Education, 3(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00173-z

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2025). Factors influencing academic staff satisfaction and continuous usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00506-4

Cai, L., Msafiri, M. M., & Kangwa, D. (2024). Exploring the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 7191–7264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0

Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: The sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology, 44, 7991–8000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07433-7

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chao-Rebolledo, C., & Rivera-Navarro, M. Á. (2024). Usos y percepciones de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en la educación superior en México. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 95(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie9516259

Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1006. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z

De Fine Licht, K. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Why the “banning approach” to student use is sometimes morally justified. Philosophy & Technology, 37(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9

Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2024). Strategic goals for artificial intelligence integration among STEM academics and undergraduates in African higher education: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00252-1

Hernández-Nieto, R. (2011). Instrumentos de recolección de datos en ciencias sociales y ciencias biomédicas. Universidad de los Andes.

Hughes, L., Malik, T., Dettmer, S., Al-Busaidi, A. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Reimagining Higher Education: Navigating the Challenges of Generative AI Adoption. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10582-6

Luo, G., Niu, C., Lu, L., Wu, L., & Huang, L. (2025). Empirical study on the double-edged effects of generative artificial intelligence on team creativity among university students. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 18853–18878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13527-3

Luo, T., Muljana, P. S., Ren, X., & Young, D. (2024). Exploring instructional designers’ utilization and perspectives on generative AI tools: A mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 741–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10437-y

Mah, D.-K., y Groß, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, and ethical awareness. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00458-1

Maldonado-Suárez, N., & Santoyo-Telles, F. (2024). Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: Integración cuantitativa y cualitativa en la construcción de instrumentos de medición. REIRE Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 17(2), 1-19.

McGrath, C., Farazouli, A., & Cerratto-Pargman, T. (2024). Generative AI chatbots in higher education: A review of an emerging research area. Higher Education, 89, 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01288-w

Merino Soto, C., y Livia Segovia, J. L. (2009). Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para la validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. Anales de Psicología, 25(1), 169–171. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/74821

Penfield, R. D., & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8923–8952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8

Prasad, K. D. V., & De, T. (2024). Generative AI as a catalyst for HRM practices: Mediating effects of trust. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1362. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03842-4

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x

Wang, D., Liu, Y., Jing, X., Liu, Q., y Lu, Q. (2024). Catalyst for future education: An empirical study on the impact of artificial intelligence generated content in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(10), 11802–11825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13135-7

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bai, J. Y. H., Lee, K., Slagter Van Tryon, P. J., & Prinsloo, P. (2024). New advances in artificial intelligence applications in higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 32, s41239-024-00464–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00464-3

Publicado

2026-09-30