Using the interactive whiteboard as a tool in university classrooms
Keywords:
interactive whiteboard, ICT, virtual learning environments, teacher educationAbstract
The experience that is the result of an innovation made in the call for teaching improvement, Action 9's I Own Teaching Plan all academic convenes the University of Seville (Spain). The propose initiatives aimed at innovation and improvement of teaching practice in universities to enable the teachers implement new teaching techniques consistent with the objectives set in the development of the subjects that he teaches. Priority lines that frame our work is the study and experimentation of new teaching methods, learning-oriented and assessment of general and specific skills, in our case of the subject Information Technology and Communication, and the promotion and use of active methodologies and promoting teamwork. The experience has been developed during the academic year 2011-12 and it involved a total of 111 first-year students of the grade of the Faculty of Education at the University of Seville (Spain). There have been several objectives of our work, the main immersing our students in educational innovation and learning through the use of the interactive whiteboard while we generate new methodologies in the classroom involving the active participation and collaborative of students in the class dynamics.
References
Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers & Education, vol. 48, núm. 1, pp. 30-43.
BECTA (2007). Evaluation of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project Manchester. Education & Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University. Recuperado el 15 de enero de 2012 de http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/research/international_research/uk/becta_executive_expansion_summary.pdf
Eurydice (2011). Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe. Recuperado el 20 de enero de 2012 de http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/129EN.pdf.
Fernández, E., Hervás, C. y Baena, A. (2012). Las percepciones de agentes educativos hacia la incorporación de la pizarra digital interactiva en el aula. Revista Educativa Hekademos, núm. 11, año V.
Gandol, F., Álvarez, E. y Prats, M. (2012). Potencialidades y limitaciones de la pizarra digital interactiva. Una revisión crítica de la literatura. Pixel-Bit, núm. 40, pp. 171-183.
Hervás, C., Toledo, P. y González, M. (2010). La utilización conjunta de la pizarra digital interactiva y el sistema de participación senteo: una experiencia universitaria. Pixel-Bit, núm. 3, pp. 203-214.
Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 32, núm.3, pp. 227-241.
Lewin, C. et al. (2009). The impact of formal and informal professional development opportunities on primary teachers’ adoption of interactive whiteboards. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 18, núm. 2, pp. 173-185.
Marquès, P. y Casals, P. (2002). La pizarra digital en el aula de clase, una de las tres bases tecnológicas de la escuela del futuro. Revista Fuentes, núm.4, pp. 36-44.
MEC (2006a). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE nº 106 de 4 de mayo de 2006. Recuperado el 23 de febrero de 2007 de http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/05/04/pdfs/A17158-17207.pdf
MEC (2006b). Real Decreto 1513/2006, de 7 de diciembre, por el que se establecen las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. BOE nº 293 de 8 de diciembre de 20006, 43053-43102. Recuperado el 23 de febrero de 2007 de http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/12/08/pdfs/A43053-43102.pdf.
MEC (2009). Resolución de 3 de agosto de 2009, de la Secretaría General Técnica, por la que se publica el Acuerdo del Consejo de Ministros de 31 de julio de 2009, por el que se formalizan los criterios de distribución, así como la distribución resultante, para el año 2009, de los créditos presupuestarios para la aplicación del Programa Escuela 2.0, aprobados por la Conferencia Sectorial de Educación. Publicado en BOE Nº 188 (5/8/2009), 66903-66905. Recuperado el 23 de febrero de 2007 de http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2009/08/05/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-13026.pdf
Mohon, E. (2008). Smart moves? A case study of one teacher's pedagogical change through use of the interactive whiteboard'. Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 33, núm.4, pp. 301- 312. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880802497032
OFSTED (2002). ICT in schools: Effect of government initiatives. Londres: Office for Standards in Education.
Schaffhauser, D. (2009). Which Came First--The Technology or the Pedagogy? T.H.E. Journal, vol. 36, núm. 8, pp. 27-32.
Slay, H., Siebörger, I. & Hodgkinson-Williams, Ch. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just ‘‘lipstick”? Computers & Education, vol. 51, núm. 3, pp. 1321-1341.
Somyurek, S., Atasoy, B. & Ozdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers & Education, vol. 53, núm. 2, pp. 368-374.
Torff, B. & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, vol. 54, núm.2, pp. 379-383.
UNESCO (2008). Estándares de competencias en TIC para docentes. Recuperado el 10 de agosto de 2011 de http://www.eduteka.org/EstandaresDocentesUnesco.php
Watson, D. (1993). The Impact Report: An evaluation of the impact of IT on children's achi evements in primary and secondary schools. Londres: DfEE and King's College London.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The copyright belongs to the authors of the text. In case the manuscript is accepted for publication, the Sistema de Universidad Virtual of the Universidad de Guadalajara (UDGVirtual) is authorized to modify the text in the correction of style, translate, fix, disseminate, reproduce, publish and market with this. Likewise, the Universidad de Guadalajara is authorized to carry out the above described jointly or through possible third parties. (See the detailed authorization in the copyright letter.)
The authors guarantee to Apertura the right to be the first means of publication of the work. The reproduction of the texts published in the Apertura is authorized, in whole or in part, as long as it is non-profit, the source is cited and the content or design is not modified. Authors may exclusively distribute the final editorial or postprint version in any medium and at any time.
Apertura, its editors and UDGVirtual dissociate themselves from the information provided by collaborators or advertisers. The articles of the contributors do not necessarily represent the point of view of the publisher or UDGVirtual and the content of the advertisements are the sole responsibility of the contractors.
Apertura is registered in the National Institute of Copyright with the ISSN number: 1665-6180 (printed version) and e-ISSN 2007-1094 (electronic version), and with the Certificate of Reservation of Rights to the Exclusive Use of the Title: 04 -2005-120212472000-102.
It is also certified by the Qualifying Commission for Illustrated Publications and Journals of the Ministry of the Interior with the Licensed Certificates of Title number: 13449; and Content Legality: 11022.