Artificial Intelligence-Based Teaching Support System for Personalized Learning in Higher Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v18n2.2882

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Higher education, Learning styles, Personalized learning, Teacher support

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design and evaluate an artificial intelligence-driven teacher support system capable of translating multidimensional learning profiles into instructional and assessment recommendations for higher education. The proposal integrated five diagnostic dimensions: VARK, for preferences in accessing information; FSLSM, for processing and representation traits; ICAP, for levels of cognitive engagement; SRL, for self-regulated learning; and EBSI, for study habits. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. In the quantitative phase, a digital questionnaire was administered to 145 students from five universities, and the data were processed through a system developed in Python, which generated diagnostic profiles and personalized pedagogical reports for teachers. In the qualitative phase, four instructors evaluated the usefulness, perceived coherence, feasibility, and ethical acceptability of the reports. The results showed substantial convergence between the diagnosis calculated without AI and the narrative generated with AI in dimensions such as VARK and ICAP, as well as favorable acceptance by the teaching staff. However, mismatches were identified in the calibration of FSLSM and in the intensity attributed to SRL and EBSI. It is concluded that AI can mediate instructional decision-making under pedagogical supervision

References

Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1-2), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306

Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web (pp. 3-53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.

Fleming, N. D. (2006). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. The VARK Group. https://vark-learn.com/

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137-155.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

OECD. (2020). The impact of AI on learning, teaching, and education: Policies for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/747832c4-en

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, D. Sampson, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 277-294). Routledge.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Valenzuela González, J. R., & Flores Fahara, M. (2011). Fundamentos de investigación educativa (Vol. 2). Editorial Digital Tecnológico de Monterrey.

Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Acee, T. W. (2016). LASSI user manual (3rd ed.). H&H Publishing.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30